Monday, 14 September 2015

#RiversElectionTribunal: Army, INEC, DSS Testifying Has No Effect - Wike

The Rivers state Government has dismissed the testimonies of some witnesses
that have appeared before the Rivers Governorship election petition tribunal sitting
in Abuja.
The state Government in a statement signed by Opunabo Inko-Tariah, the Special
Adviser on Media to Governor Nyesom Wike took a swipe at the Military
personnel that discredited the elections in the state.

The state government also downplayed the testimony of the Senior INEC Official,
Charles Okoye who also claimed the elections were marred by violence and
intimidation.
Inko-Tariah said all the testimonies so far were in contradiction to the facts
before the Justice Ambrosa-led Tribunal.
He accused the Army of playing the script of the petitioner, the All Progressives
Congress, adding that the Military men “merely lied on oath”.
The statement reads, “The news making the rounds that an INEC staff at the
ongoing Governorship Election Tribunal for Rivers state, gave testimonies
confirming alleged irregularities, violence and ballot box snatching is entirely
meaningless and of no consequence to the substance of the matters at the
Tribunal.
“Although this should not ordinarily be an issue for media debate, being a matter
before a Tribunal, it is important to straighten the records for public information
to the effect all that all the bogus claims by the busybody INEC staff represented
were not only entirely scripted but dead on arrival.
“This is because INEC itself which is his employer and a key defendant in the
matter at the Tribunal had conducted an independent investigation into the
alleged malpractices and purported violence in Rivers state through three national
Commissioners assigned for that purpose and they respectively reported that
elections in the state were free, fair and credible and that it was indeed the APC
that fermented trouble during the elections in Rivers state.
“It is important to note however that it was the then INEC Chairman Prof. Atahiru
Jega who read out this report on national Television and abroad in various fora,
thus revalidating the election of Nyesom Wike as Governor of Rivers state.
FOLLOW US ON TWITTER : @mcugochukwu 
“It should also be recalled that the Tribunal under the current Chairman, Justice
Ambrose, in his recent ruling, struck out paragraphs touching on electoral
violence and parties mentioned in the petition who are not before the Tribunal,
thus rendering the petition against Governor Wike almost useless and very weak.
“Counsel to Governor Wike Adedipe SAN had confirmed that the testimony by the
said witness contradicts that of INEC since he claimed he monitored elections in
several parts of the state, although he gave testimony not in his capacity as an
INEC staff, thus raising questions around his locus to testify if not speaking the
mind of INEC which he claims he works for.
“However, it will be more responsible for the Tribunal to be allowed to give its
judgement on the matters before it, even though the APC has now suddenly
realized that it has no case and continuous rumour mongering will not be in their
interest.
On the Soldier’s, Wike said, “Truth is one thing that remains incontrovertible.
Malice, hatred or ignorance may deride or distort it but it still remains .
“The testimony at the Rivers state Governorship Election Tribunal by an Army
Captain to the effect that there was no election in Rivers state is a testimony of
falsehood completely devoid of merit.
“It follows that the army was never involved in the election process and so can
not be taken seriously.
“It is therefore pertinent to ask the following questions:
“Was the Army an election monitoring agent?
“Did the army do any report in the purported electoral Violence in Rivers state or
was all of these an afterthought just to score cheap points?
“Who were those that instigated the so-called violence and what has become of
them if any?
“The crucial point to note here is that suborn witnessing does not translate into
victory for APC. I glean from the captain’s testimony a veiled compromising bias.

No comments:

Post a Comment